Inicio TLF Radio Blogs Juegos Gente Videos Enlace de Usuarios Audios Sitios Encuestas Buscar Eventos Ayuda Diccionario Más
 
Vista Posteos

RIAA 2, Jammie Thomas-Rasset 0
Maybe Jammie Thomas-Rasset should have quit while she was behind. Just as in Thomas-Rasset's first trial in 2007, a Minnesota jury found today that she infringed the copyrights of two dozen major-label songs on the Kazaa file-sharing network. But the new jury handed down a much larger punishment -- $80,000 a song Canada Goose greece, not $9,250. For the labels, that's roughly equivalent to selling 114,000 songs at Apple's iTunes Store. Thomas-Rasset didn't seem likely to pay the original $222,000 penalty, so it seems even less likely that the RIAA will be able to extract nearly $2 million from her. The trade group has always been more interested in winning the judgment than the amount awarded; spokeswoman Cara Duckworth told CNet that the group has been willing to settle " since day one." But the size of the jury's verdict may only increase calls for Congress or the courts to reduce the financial penalties for copyright infringementThomas-Rasset's was the first trial in the campaign against individual file-sharers that the RIAA began in 2003 and ended late last year. As such, it was one of the few tests of the legal underpinnings of that campaign, including the argument that making tracks available to others online (by keeping them in a folder that was open for sharing) was a form of infringement. U.S. District Judge Michael J. Davis instructed the jury in Thomas-Rasset's first trial that making songs available was an infringement, a low threshold that would enable the labels to prove piracy just by collecting lists of the songs in people's shared folders. But Davis second-guessed himself after the verdict and ordered a new trial, mirroring the views of several other judges who had rejected the RIAA's interpretation of the law.The result of the second trial suggests that the higher threshold isn't enough to derail the labels in an infringement lawsuit. The RIAA's anti-piracy contractor, MediaSentry, presented evidence that Thomas-Rasset actually distributed 11 copyrighted songs through Kazaa (to MediaSentry's investigators), and cited metadata from tracks in her shared folder strongly suggesting that the files had themselves been downloaded, not purchased or ripped from her CD collection. RIAA witnesses also linked the Kazaa uploads to a unique identifier on Thomas-Rasset's modem and computer and showed that the unusual username on the Kazaa account matched one that Thomas-Rasset acknowledged using on several other websites. In other words, the RIAA's case was built entirely on circumstantial evidence, but there was a lot of it.Thomas-Rasset and her attorneys seemed eager to continue their battle against the RIAA MBT delle donne, and although the trade group insists that it doesn't plan to file any new cases, there are still a number of older claims yet to be resolved. Defense attorneys are fighting these on several fronts moncler muts, arguing that, among other things, MediaSentry's investigative tactics were illegal. More interesting acheter bottes ugg, IMHO, is the argument Harvard Law Professor Charles Nesson and others are raising that the statutory damages provided in copyright law are grossly excessive -- even unconstitutionally so. The two Thomas-Rasset verdicts, each of which was reached after just a few hours of deliberations, reflect the juries' irritation with her defense. But even if she did put 24 copyrighted songs in her shared folder True Religion for Men, it's hard to believe that the labels suffered anything close to $2 million in damages. More important, the mere threat of such a penalty could persuade some accused infringers to settle with the RIAA rather than fight, even if they weren't the ones responsible. Thomas-Rasset may not be a sympathetic defendant timberland oslo, and there's no excuse for illegal downloading. But she will have done all Internet users a favor if her case prompts lawmakers to recalibrate the statutory damages in copyright law.-- Jon Healey Healey writes editorials for The Times' Opinion Manufacturing Division.Photo credit: Julia Cheng / Associated PressTopics related articles:
Mari0046 08.12.2011 0 201
Publicidad

Bloque HTML
Comentarios
Ordenar por: 
Por página:
 
  • Aún no hay comentarios
Información de Entrada
08.12.2011 (4546 días)
Publicidad

 

 

 

Calificar
0 votos
Recomendar
Acciones
Categorías
Baby Blogs (2 publicaciones)
Blogging for Money (3 publicaciones)
Books (3 publicaciones)
City Blogs (2 publicaciones)
Dating and Personals (10 publicaciones)
Entertainment Blogs (2 publicaciones)
Food Blogs (3 publicaciones)
Games (3 publicaciones)
Health (44 publicaciones)
Holidays (2 publicaciones)
Lifestyle (4 publicaciones)
Movies (2 publicaciones)
Music (3 publicaciones)
Politics (3 publicaciones)
Tech News (15 publicaciones)
Videos (1 publicaciones)